accines work.
It’s not a matter of opinion. It’s an objective
scientific fact. A virus cannot be destroyed except by eliminating its ability
to reproduce.
You cannot kill a virus because it is not a whole living organism. Unlike
bacteria, a virus doesn’t eat, you cannot starve it to death. It doesn’t reproduce sexually so there’s no
way to make it infertile. It does not have intelligence so there’s no way to
influence its behavior.
So the only way to stop it from multiplying is to
disrupt the biochemical mechanism by which it copies itself. Our immune system
does this by directly dismantling the cluster of proteins that make up a virus.
This is conventional one-one-one combat on a subcellular level. Unfortunately, the
immune system is limited by the resources
of the finite individual cells that make our bodies. On the other hand, sky is the limit in the growth and
reproduction of viruses. In a population competition, our
disease-fighting antibodies get overwhelmed if it’s a purely numbers game.
Enter modern genetics technology. The idea sounds
unbelievably simple. You don’t have to destroy the whole virus—just its DNA—that
pesky double helix of organized molecules that carry the blueprint of future
copies of the same protein. Scientists
have discovered a way of adding new sequences to that chain that effectively
tells the protein it has become stable enough to remain inert permanently—ergo,
to stop reproducing until it’s simply metabolized away. In other words, the viruses’ DNA is
deprogrammed not unlike the way software hackers introduce “patches” of new programming
code in a computer software to disrupt and change the way a computer
program executes.
It’s all done in virtual laboratories where the
battleground is the software simulator. This is why it took scientists no more
than a year to produce a testable vaccine. They were not playing around with
the virus itself, trying to coax it into benevolent mutation in a petri dish
and counting on the virus to cooperate.
They were just mapping its genome sequence to find the right spot to
paste that patch of new destructive genetic code.
Scientists have been doing this for years.
Genetically modified organisms have been around for decades, especially as food
for human consumption. From featherless chicken that need no dressing and go
straight from farm to freezer, tank-grown
fish that reach maturity in less than 45 days and chicken eggs that
scramble and go over easy but would never hatch into chicks. There are seedless
varieties now of almost any fruit you could think of—orange, watermelon,
strawberry, cucumber--you name it.
The public uproar over GMO’s has all but vanished,
not necessarily due to the death of outrage, but more because of unwitting
public acceptance fueled by consumption.
The bread you ate this morning for breakfast was baked with flour from wheatfields
that were no longer pollinated by bees, and you couldn’t care less.
If your objection to vaccines is because of the
genetic engineering component involved in its production, then you’re placing
your sentimental empathy for organic vegetables, natural poultry and livestock on the same
pedestal as some unexplainable concern
for the health and well-being of deadly
viruses.
And that is just plain absurd.Ⓒ 2021 Joel R, Dizon
No comments:
Post a Comment